Editors: Difference between revisions

From UNB Archives and Special Collections
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 7: Line 7:
= RichTextEditor =
= RichTextEditor =


The RichTextEditor is easier to learn and use than the WikiTextEditor.&nbsp;For some, the&nbsp;'''RichTextEditor'''&nbsp;toolbar will prove intuitive because it contains functions similar to popular word processors.&nbsp;<span style="line-height: 1.6;">This toolbar facilitates many of the functions that will be necessary for the creation of basic content.</span>
The '''RichTextEditor''' is easier to learn and use than the WikiTextEditor.&nbsp;For some, the&nbsp;RichTextEditor&nbsp;toolbar will prove intuitive because it contains functions similar to those of commonly used word processors.&nbsp;<span style="line-height: 1.6;">This toolbar facilitates many of the functions that will be necessary for the creation of basic content.</span>


<span style="line-height: 1.6;">The toolbar is static in the functions that it offers, but also flexible in that it will change depending on the size of the browser window by which it is accessed. When editing, the Contributor will have access to all the tools included here (though perhaps in a slightly different layout):</span>
<span style="line-height: 1.6;">The toolbar is static in the functions that it provides. When editing, the Contributor will have access to all the tools included here (though perhaps in a slightly different layout):</span>


[[File:EditorToolbar.png|center]]
[[File:EditorToolbar.png|center]]
Line 17: Line 17:
= WikiTextEditor =
= WikiTextEditor =


The WikiTextEditor may prove more difficult to learn as it is more of a coding language. However, if unintimidated by the prospect of a basic coding the WikiText language is not particularly difficult to learn and very functional. It is also necessary to access some of the more advanced editing features.
The '''WikiTextEditor''' may prove more difficult to learn as it is more of a coding language. However, if unintimidated by the prospect of a basic coding the WikiText language is not particularly difficult to learn and very functional. It is also necessary to access some of the more advanced editing features.
<p style="text-align: center;"><span style="line-height: 1.6;">Click&nbsp;</span>[http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Help:Formatting here]&nbsp;<span style="line-height: 1.6;">for a basic guide to the formatting that can be applied using the WikiTextEditor.</span></p>[[Category:Mark's Contributions|Mark's_Contributions]]
<p style="text-align: center;"><span style="line-height: 1.6;">Click&nbsp;</span>[http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Help:Formatting here]&nbsp;<span style="line-height: 1.6;">for a basic guide to the formatting that can be applied using the WikiTextEditor.</span></p>[[Category:Mark's Contributions|Mark's_Contributions]]

Revision as of 09:21, 18 June 2014

MediaWiki provides two editors for the editing of wiki content. The RichTextEditor is the default editor. Select the edit tab to enter the editing interface:

SelectEdit.png


RichTextEditor

The RichTextEditor is easier to learn and use than the WikiTextEditor. For some, the RichTextEditor toolbar will prove intuitive because it contains functions similar to those of commonly used word processors. This toolbar facilitates many of the functions that will be necessary for the creation of basic content.

The toolbar is static in the functions that it provides. When editing, the Contributor will have access to all the tools included here (though perhaps in a slightly different layout):

EditorToolbar.png


WikiTextEditor

The WikiTextEditor may prove more difficult to learn as it is more of a coding language. However, if unintimidated by the prospect of a basic coding the WikiText language is not particularly difficult to learn and very functional. It is also necessary to access some of the more advanced editing features.

Click here for a basic guide to the formatting that can be applied using the WikiTextEditor.